Saturday, September 12, 2009

Web 2.0 Assignment

Once you have created the blog, read the article titled Military Intelligence Goes Web 2.0. The article talks about how the intelligence community is adopting Web 2.0 tools. Using this brief paper as a guide and having written a position paper as part of a team, do you think it is a good idea for the Intelligence Community to adopt these tools? Post these thoughts to your blog.


Wow! The thought of our government using a blog space to collaborate on government projects is not only mind blowing, but scary as well! I think that a wiki can be a great tool for group collaboration. In fact, our group came up with the following advantages to using a wiki:
  • Younger workers expect/demand this (soon it will be expected for everyone to know how to use these)
  • gives everyone a voice
  • brings together management and employees
  • brings together company, partners, and customers
  • expands marketing opportunities
  • encourages immediacy
  • encourages openness (some employees could be scared to voice their opinions for fear of losing their jobs)
  • share files of greater size (one picture used to fill my email box)
  • always has a saved archive of previous information shared
  • easier to express thoughts without being face to face
  • great free advertising for people, products, and services
  • most up to date information possible (business laws, market condition, company policies, etc)
  • great way for leads for sales and hiring
  • changes can be made and seen in real time; no waiting on emails or shared files
  • eliminates geographic boundaries (people in different parts of the world can all work on the same project together at the same time)
  • ease of use for even novice users
  • wiki's are flexible to a wide range of formats and structures
  • no one specific person is responsible for a project
  • everyone in a group can see changes/contributions, so it reduces the likelihood of non-participation from group members
  • participants can easily expand on each other’s ideas


Even with all of the advantages, I don’t think that a wiki is the proper place for government agency collaboration. Our group discussed the following points as disadvantages to a wiki:

  • Encourages informality (texting lingo instead of formal language)
  • discourages face to face contact
  • no nonverbal communication (hard to recognize emotion)
  • gives equal voice to experts and ‘experts’ (information may not be reliable or truthful)
  • not very secure/not a good place for secrets
  • can be expensive to implement
  • may divide the older and younger workers of a company (or novice to advanced technology users)
  • kinda brings private life into the business world (like facebook which employers make check)
  • lack of privacy to those outside the company (as compared to conference calls and face to face meetings)
  • requires the use of the internet (as compared to conference calls and face to face meetings)
  • can easily become disorganized when there are too many users


To me, the biggest disadvantage as far as government collaboration online is concerned is the security issue. I’m sure that government wikis and other Web 2.0 platforms are highly encrypted and have other security measures in place, but there are always people out there that do their best to hack these platforms. Just the fact that it is government information would make it that much more appealing to a hacker; the bigger the challenge, the greater the thrill of hacking it.


Overall, in the case of government collaboration, I don’t think that the advantages outweigh the huge security risk involved in Web 2.0 platforms such as wikis.

4 comments:

  1. I agree. There are major concerns for many of us when we start talking about the govenment intelligence agencies using 2.0 elements. Security. I han't really focused on the fact that it would be ultra-cool to hack just because it was the government and it is a great point. I brought up the fact that for many of these hackers, it is seen as a form of job application, but hadn't really thought about it the same way you did. Good stuff in the post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree with your ideas because WIKI can be an excellent source of opinion, equal voice opportunities, and many times it is very easy to use. However, the main concern which I have as well is the security because there are experts out there which even though their WIKIS are encrypted they will find ways to hack them. I really think that these types of systems are more suitable for companies which inside information can be share between all employees. Also, these types of systems are suitable for social causes such as to write other people mails, and to do a team work.


    Excellent thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Again the security issue comes up! That definitely needs to be a major concern. I'd love to know how much of our intelligence is actually hacked already, but that's probably so incredibly classified that only the hackers actually know! I have mixed feelings about wikipedia. I love to read it and go from topic to topic learning new, random things, but I always take what I'm reading with a grain of salt. If something seems off, I definitely try to check it because anyone can call themselves an expert...

    ReplyDelete
  4. oh, and cute kid! i have a daughter that'll be five months this week. it's been a hectic few months, so I understand the time constraints on your schedule! good luck, and it definitely gets easier!!

    ReplyDelete